Open Ed - Week 9

What can the open education movement learn from the book you chose to read? Elaborate on at least three points. Which of the ideas presented in the book did you find hardest to believe or agree with? Why?

I read "Free Culture" by L.Lessig :-) Sometimes the book tells funny situations (e.g. Clint Eastwood CD) but, over all, it highlights some paradoxes and incompatibilities between the society needs and the political answers. I generally share the book ideas, but the contents make me think about the general situation of our system. I'm gonna try to explain right there.

The peculiarity of open content looks like every change in our  society. Normally it determines two deployments: people who want and hope innovations, people who don't want them. The second group hide its fears with a series of topics wich talk about loss of values, of traditions an so on. I think the true reason is the loss of economical benefits. The battle is very stong and hard, as well as  history teaches. There are people who fight all life long for new ideas and sometimes they're not in the right place at the right moment. So they spend their life searching changes without seeing them. It's very sad! Now, in the specific field of open content and education, many people all over the world can do something for this idea. It's enought using open content to became an innovation person, in fact it allows the growth of open contents too. I think, and hope so, the sharing of open content  will become larger and will have  right and appropriate lows.

I read also a summery of "The world is flat" by T.Friedman where I found some concept about globalisation. There is an economical globalisation where it is important to recognize the potentialities of people all over the world. The qualities that new generations must look to are strategic skills - right brain skill, or those that cannot be duplicate by a computer - and the sure works of the next years will be the synthesizers, explainers and leveragers. Another globalisation is the cultural one but it is old. People have always travelled (since australopitecus), it doesn't exist a pure culture but it's  important that everyone can express its own potentiality.

The last reading (summary) was "Wikinomics" by D.Tapscott and A.D.Williams, which explain how is (will be) the partecipated economy. It insists on the collaborative work based on competitive principles such as openness, peering,  sharing and acting globally structure in opposite to the hierarchical model. The book has a good site http://www.wikinomics.com/index.php .

Fortunately next week -thanks new syllabus :-)- I'll have the time to read my collegues' blogs, it'll gives me the possibility to reflect about the topics of this week.

Emanuela Zibordi

Thank you!

Thank you for your clarification. It is really good. I am just a beginner in the field also, it is still hard for me to criticize on other's thoughts. I am trying to get better and better in all the classes I am taking now. We will struggle first, and hope things get better. Thank you and hang in there!

My comments

Seems like you read a few books. I also read "The World is flat", and I share the same thoughts with you. But how can you relate your thoughts to open education movement? And in the thoughts of "Free Culture", do you agree with all what the author talks about? Do you have some ideas that might be against the author's ideas?

Hi Jessi, I try to aswer to

Hi Jessi, I try to aswer to your post.
"But how can you relate your thoughts to open education movement?"
I think that every change in the people mind requests time. The difference of the past is that we now can have faster connections, we can talk together just in time.
We're in the beginning of a new era. The future will be very different from today. I hope and I trust in the strength of this movement.

"And in the thoughts of "Free Culture", do you agree with all what the author talks about? Do you have some ideas that might be against the author's ideas?"

Reading the course documents I realise that OEM is a complex system wich presents many variables. Now I cannot express any ideas (pro or con the authors) because I'm just in the learning phase. I'd like wait for concrete situations. Moreover for me it's difficult too think about world projects. I prefere think to achieve little projects, in my work context.
Thank you a lot.
Emanuela

An Orwellian landscape, by Elisa

I also read Free Culture and share your same opinions. It is terrible that instead of rewarding creativity and allowing the springing of new creativity, the laws are being toughened because of the fear of the great amplifier and multiplier power of the Internet. They condemn the technology (that is neutral) rather than condemning its negative uses. But in Italy we are not better, unfortunately.